|
The Soviet Union is no more; the nations that formed that loose political group have all but embraced the free market system. They are technically non-existent on a “second-world” order any more. They are also not much more advanced than some of the countries that are still lumped into the “third world” order. Some good examples of such nations are Malaysia, Thailand, Turkey and several Middle Eastern countries. And, both China and India are poised to rise again, as behemoths. They will soon contribute 40% of world GDP (as they traditionally had done in the past). Clearly, the world order is about to crumble. What then of the arrogant division of nations into tiers? Clearly some of the 1st world nations will slip and fall. What of them? Division of nations into 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th world was never necessary. It was only done to broadcast a certain superiority of the Western nations. It was degrading to those who were lumped into the lower strata. There was always only one world, and any change in circumstances is very transitory. In the context of history of nations and civilizations, these stages are but a twinkle. Therefore, it was sheer ignorance that prompted the use of such degrading terms. It should never have been used and should never again be used in the future. Nations can be divided according to geographical, cultural, ethnic or political groups; never according to their wealth. Otherwise, one will be forced to write and re-write the list of nations rather frequently. The sun has set with Britannia; some other wealthy nations will follow in due course. With their decline, the racial superiority the division of the world into groups based on prosperity was intended to cultivate will die as well!
|